News:

Welcome to MFE. Please discover and discuss with fellow members the music that interests you.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Lionel Harrison

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 37
1
General musical discussion / Re: Pristine Classical
« on: December 15, 2025, 11:34:57 am »
Thanks, Kevin. I was unaware of this service. Although I'm unlikely to take out a subscription myself, I warmly applaud Mr. Rose's initiative.

2
Miscellaneous / Re: Hello (again)!
« on: December 13, 2025, 11:21:29 am »
Blimey, Kevin. As my old mother would've said, "you've had a basinful"; I'm glad it's behind you now. Only another week at the treadmill before settling back to inhale the lovely, Welsh air, and plough gently through that mountain of recordings...

3
Miscellaneous / Re: Hello (again)!
« on: December 11, 2025, 03:36:40 pm »
Hello, Kevin! It's good to hear from you again. I'm so glad to learn that your health issues have been overcome. My health has been up and down over the last year or so, as has John's (Albion) and so it seems "there's a lot of it about", as they say. I'm still hanging on, although rendered all-but immobile by sciatica. Actually, the immobility isn't so much an issue as the discomfort, but least said about that the better. As you say, you never know what's around the corner, especially at my age (I'm 73) and so I try to get as much joy as possible out of every day, and I find Dr. Music to be the practitioner of choice in that aim.

Your move to Tywyn is obviously a smart one -- as you say, the Welsh sea air can only be beneficial; I imagine that Dafydd (cilgwyn), as a steadfast Welshman, will approve heartily. Anyhow, I, for one, will look forward to seeing your future contributions. Stay well, friend. Lionel.

4
You really do have an encyclopaedic knowledge of operetta! I admit that mine is limited to the standard fare of Sullivan, Offenbach, Lehár, Johann Strauss II, Suppé and odds and ends at the periphery of the Austro-Hungarian tradition. But Fred Raymond? Nein!

I am currently listening to this, released today:



I haven't had any direct involvement with this one, although it does contain three of the scores of which my late, lamented friend, Patrick Meadows and I produced the first editions way back when (the Ballade for Violin and Orchestra, the Romance, and Zara's Earrings). I will say that the performance of the Ballade on this release isn't as convincing as the one of the Avie disc with Curtis Stewart and Mike Repper: that takes 12:53, whereas this new one takes 15:25, which tells you all you need to know but the rest of the disc is really well done and will hopefully add to the numbers of SC-T fans in this anniversary year.

It is cold by here, although not as cold as it probably is by there! Stay wrapped up warm, Dafydd!
Very interesting and a nice picture of the composer on the front. Taking a little more time over a piece of music has it's advantages and disadvantages. In this instance taking more time over the piece seems to work to it's disadvantage. You obviously know your Samuel Coleridge-Taylor,so the Avie performance would be the one I would need to hear. I'm still hoping I will get to hear the recent Chandos cd of Ruth Gipps' Violin Concerto and Symphony No 5. Not to mention,the recent Grace Williams cds from Resonus and Lyrita (I could go on!). The Ruth Gipps would normally have been a pre-order! :( And is there any room here for actual cds? I might have to go down the download route whether I like it or not! (Not! :()

If I had to pick one of those operetta composers,the pick of the bunch has to Leon Jessel's Scharwaldmadel,which really is a stand-out score. In his review of the now deleted Warner reissue John Sheppard described the operetta as a "real discovery"! If I was to recommend an operetta composer you might not have heard I would recommend Emmerich Kalman. That said,it seems to me that in terms of music to listen to,you have pretty much a full house (and W.C.! :o ;D) to get on with!
At very his best I would put Kalman on a level with Lehar for sheer tunefulness and the sheer brilliance and mastery of his orchestration. Die Csardasfurstin and Grafin Mariza are masterpieces of the genre (I also rate Die Bajadere very highly). The old emi-electrola recordings with Anneliese Rothenberger in the lead are the recordings to go for! Bonynge's recording of Die Bajadere is better than I could have hoped for;although Bonynge's idea of a fox-trot is strangely slow & the tenor seems to think he's singing lieder!! The thoroughly excellent 1980 soviet era Russian recording of the complete score sadly long deleted and unavailable!) Kalman's scores are also free of the sentimentality which comes to the fore in some of Lehar's later scores.

While it's true what you say about space, it's my head that's more or less full now. Every last corner is taken up with recordings, memories of concerts given and attended, and scores edited and published! It's really quite tiring.

Actually, Emmerich Kalman is one of those I should have included in my list of stuff on the periphery of operetta that I like. I take your points about tunefulness (which is, after all, the greatest challenge for any composer) and brilliance of orchestration. 

5
You really do have an encyclopaedic knowledge of operetta! I admit that mine is limited to the standard fare of Sullivan, Offenbach, Lehár, Johann Strauss II, Suppé and odds and ends at the periphery of the Austro-Hungarian tradition. But Fred Raymond? Nein!

I am currently listening to this, released today:



I haven't had any direct involvement with this one, although it does contain three of the scores of which my late, lamented friend, Patrick Meadows and I produced the first editions way back when (the Ballade for Violin and Orchestra, the Romance, and Zara's Earrings). I will say that the performance of the Ballade on this release isn't as convincing as the one of the Avie disc with Curtis Stewart and Mike Repper: that takes 12:53, whereas this new one takes 15:25, which tells you all you need to know but the rest of the disc is really well done and will hopefully add to the numbers of SC-T fans in this anniversary year.

It is cold by here, although not as cold as it probably is by there! Stay wrapped up warm, Dafydd!

6
Lionel, I would recommend listening to Scott‘s first symphony again. It‘s such a charming romantic piece!
Around 1900 Grainger, Scott and O‘Neill sounded very similar I think. Maybe this has something to do with the Frankfurt connection?

Thank you very much. I do actually have the Chandos recording of it with the BBC Philharmonic under Martyn Brabbins and so, on the basis of your recommendation, I will definitely give that another spin!

7
I can't say I have ever gotten into Scott's music. The way things are, I'm likely to look to him less for cogent symphonic argument and more for commonsense on constipation! ;D

8
I wholeheartedly agree with you about Khachaturian: the Lullaby from Gayaneh is one of the loveliest melodies in the 20th century orchestral repertoire.

9
I downloaded all of George Lloyd's symphonies a while back but I've yet to listen to any of them. Maybe your post will prompt me to investigate one or two of them this weekend. Then again...

As for Anton Rubinstein, I know almost none of his stuff aside from the 4th concerto, of which I have three recordings, including one by Oscar Levant (of all people) with the New York Phil under Dimitri Mitropoulos. It's about what you'd expect in terms of barns being stormed. I think it's unlikely I will get into Rubinstein now. I remember hearing André Previn being interviewed on the radio years ago, and the interviewer asking him if he had any unfulfilled ambitions. He said, "Yes, my goal is to listen to every piece of music ever written!" I'm sure we can all empathise with the philosophy behind that, as well the impossibility of it!

10
The Adagio (Sehr feierlich und sehr langsam) of Bruckner 7 is one of the few movements of his that I like and that I think is pretty near perfect. As for the symphony as a whole, I am reminded of a comment made by the Bach scholar, Dr. Peter Williams, who was one of my lecturers at Edinburgh: we happened to be sitting next to each other in the Usher Hall for an SNO concert in which the second half consisted of Bruckner 7. At the end, as the applause died down, he turned to me and said: "Nice key, E Major. I could listen to it all night. You bloody well have to with Bruckner 7." I can relate this story now without fear of offending Dr. Williams's amour-propre since he sadly died in 2016.
;D

As a self confessed Baxian,since I was about knee high to a grasshopper (albeit a small,skinny one! That's me not the grasshopper! ;D)) I must admit I wasn't too thrilled by your view of Bax! But I did ask,didn't I?!! ;D I also can't help but remember the wise words of Dundonell (Colin) whose contributions I do miss,that if we agreed about everything we wouldn't have a forum! Nuff said! When it comes to Anton Bruckner though,I have to say I do share your misgivings!

I did try hard with that Bruckner symphony! As per my previous experience listening to Bruckner,and particularly No 7,I begin by thinking,I like what I'm hearing. After a while I'm starting to think I'm hearing the same sequence repeated over and over again (or is it my imagination?! ::) The other problem is the one of......is this actually leading anywhere?! Listening on wireless headphones admittedly,doesn't exactly help (particularly when the cd player is in another room!). But after a few listens I can usually work out where I am? I think to myself....is it because it's very long? But most of Mahler's symphonies are very long. Another problem is that Bruckner seems to be regarded as one of the greats by allot of people. His symphonies enjoy multiple recording cycles and are performed in concerts,so unlike say Draeseke,for example,who the only people who think he's anything but a third rank,fourth rank also-ran,confer at a certain forum,not to mention a particularly notorious dictatorship of the last century (not Draeseke's fault to be fair) you are aware of this consensus of opinion and particularly,if you are a non-musician who can't read a note of music like me,one part of you is thinking......they can't be that wrong about this composer can they?!! Can they?!! However,it does make me wonder about the consensus of opinion that elevates certain composers to some metaphorical podium when others languish,not to mention the received opinion that seems to confer repertory status on some composers while other composers remain,seemingly forever,on the fringes,only to be heard,if at all,thanks to the enterprise of enthusiasts (like yourself) and a number of enterprising record labels?!!

I know what you mean. It does make you wonder whether it's possible that the Emperor Bruckner has no clothes. I always think of Gilbert's line in "A More Humane Mikado" - The music-hall singer attends a series/Of masses and fugues and "ops"/By Bach, interwoven/With Spohr and Beethoven,/At classical Monday Pops."

Obviously Spohr was as highly regarded as JSB and old Ludwig in 1885 even though he'd been dead for 25 years. Only later did he sink into relative obscurity. Mind you, although Bruckner's been dead for nearly 130 years, he was totally ignored until about 1950 so maybe the people who discounted him in the first half of the 20th century were right to do so, and the present high regard in which he's held in some quarters is misguided. The fact he re-wrote almost all of his symphonies, some of them multiple times, shows even he wasn't convinced by them, and so why the hell should we be? ???

11
The Adagio (Sehr feierlich und sehr langsam) of Bruckner 7 is one of the few movements of his that I like and that I think is pretty near perfect. As for the symphony as a whole, I am reminded of a comment made by the Bach scholar, Dr. Peter Williams, who was one of my lecturers at Edinburgh: we happened to be sitting next to each other in the Usher Hall for an SNO concert in which the second half consisted of Bruckner 7. At the end, as the applause died down, he turned to me and said: "Nice key, E Major. I could listen to it all night. You bloody well have to with Bruckner 7." I can relate this story now without fear of offending Dr. Williams's amour-propre since he sadly died in 2016.

12
If you collated together all those nice bits of the Bruckner Symphonies you cite, there might almost be enough material for once decent symphony. Then again, there might not! I don't recall hearing Richard Wetz's Symphonies but I have to say that his Violin Concerto is pleasant enough:



I agree with you about Ruth Gipps; it is a pity that she didn't live to see the resurgence of interest in her works but that's sadly true of a number of composers, I guess. The pendulum of taste needs time to swing back I suppose.

Enjoy your Voodoo Tales! ;D As Nick Ross used to say (at the end of Crimewatch) "Don't have nightmares." I have no hair to turn white and my beard is already the colour of Santa Claus's!

13
Nobody can accuse me of not trying with Bruckner. I have eight cycles either on CD or stored as downloads on hard drives but, try as I might, they go in one ear and out the other. Derek Watson, who wrote the Master Musicians book on Bruckner was a good mate of mine at university and he tried time and time again to get me interested but all to no avail. You are clearly right when you suggest your neighbour who thew her gumboots at your door and I are in complete agreement over Bruckner.

Meanwhile, I'm tucking into this, which I downloaded over the weekend:



I knew that Schubert had written quite a lot for piano duet -- sure-fire money-maker in the Vienna of those days -- but not 7CDs' worth! I have to say these performances are excellent. The music varies from the jolly and carefree to the almost inexpressibly profound (an example of ther latter being the F Minor Fantasy D940 of course). 

14
I can certainly agree that Bruckner could be consigned to the outer darkness. I like the two comments Brahms made about Bruckner's symphonies, both of which hit the nail on the head for me: he described them as "symphonic boa constrictors" and later said that they were "like a kind of watery stew, in which the occasional piece of gristle floats past". He did admire Bruckner's seriousness of purpose, apparently, just not the resulting music! ;D

15
Wow! Reading that makes me feel like,what have I done?! Written a few letters to record companies pleading for recordings of neglected composers and that's about all!! ::) Chandos did eventually record more Ethel Smyth though.......after something like a 20 year gap! Still,better later than never! I await the complete recording of Holbrooke's Cauldron of Annwn cycle with great eagerness! If I am alive,hopefully I'll have better hearing than Smyth when she got to hear Boult's recording of her Two Interlinked French Melodies & Interlude from 'Entente Cordiale'! (Sounding like"poisoned rats behind the wainscot")

Philipp Scharwenka does definitely sound worth hearing. I see Langgaard's name on the cd,too. A composer I have liked ever since I was a teenager and waited about six months for a Danish Lp of his Sixth Symphony and Music of the Spheres I ordered via an ad in Gramophone! No clicking on "Pay" and getting some import in a couple of days back then! No record store within miles! Ay,it was grand lad! (Cue,Hovis theme!)
Incidentally,I do intend to buy your Coleridge-Taylor cd. I'm just waiting for something to be sorted out,hopefully in the very near future. Can't say much here,but it's to do with close relatives!! :-X

What you've done is to buy the stuff, which is the point of the exercise! Well, you haven't bought our SC-T CD yet, but I take your word for it when you say you will. ;D

Yes, I remember those pre-internet days. I was going to say "it seems like a life-time ago" until I realise that it WAS a life-time ago! ::)

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 37